By Christina Hildebrand and Nicki Steinberger, Ph.D.
EDITOR’S SUMMARY: Recent changes to childhood vaccination guidance have reopened questions about how public health decisions are made and what factors shape health outcomes over time. This examination places vaccine policy alongside nutrition, baseline health, and immune resilience, distinguishing acute protection from the broader conditions that influence disease severity and recovery. It considers how dietary quality, metabolic health, and access to care intersect with medical decision-making across the lifespan, with particular attention to pediatric care where policy changes are most visible.
In January 2026, federal health officials announced revisions to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention childhood vaccination recommendations, reducing the number of vaccines advised for routine use. The change marked a notable shift in federal public health guidance and reignited debates about vaccine risk, benefit, and medical decision-making. Supporters framed the decision as an affirmation of personal medical choice and parental authority, while critics warned it could increase risk from vaccine-preventable diseases and complicate protection of vulnerable populations. Mandates can also limit flexibility in clinical decision-making, particularly for families managing complex medical histories or unique health considerations.
A central consideration in this discussion is the relationship between underlying health status and infectious disease outcomes. During the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. data showed that severe illness and death were significantly more common in individuals with pre-existing conditions such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. These patterns drew attention to the role of baseline health in shaping disease severity, recovery, and clinical outcomes across populations. From a preventive health perspective, reducing or removing vaccine mandates may be seen as an opportunity to emphasize healthcare decisions tailored to individual circumstances. However, reducing reliance on vaccines without strengthening public health measures that support baseline health could increase vulnerability to illness.
One proposed strategy involves increased emphasis on what some practitioners refer to as nutritional immunity. In the scientific literature, this concept is described in the study “Nutritional Immunity: Starving Pathogens of Trace Minerals,” which defines nutritional immunity as “a process by which a host organism sequesters trace minerals in an effort to limit pathogenicity during infection.” In this view, nutrition is not positioned as a replacement for medical care, but as one component of a comprehensive approach to health that may influence how individuals respond to infectious challenges over time and across contexts.
Shared decision-making and pediatric care
While baseline health influences outcomes at every age, these considerations take on distinct nuances in pediatric care. In U.S. healthcare, this collaborative approach is recognized as a framework in which clinicians and families work together to evaluate benefits, risks, and options of a particular medical treatment in a way that aligns with family values and medical evidence. Rather than prescribing a single course of action, this model emphasizes dialogue, transparency, and mutual understanding, particularly in areas where benefits and risks may vary by individual circumstance. When vaccine mandates for school attendance are in place, families often make vaccination decisions within the context of school entry requirements. In these cases, the timing and circumstances of the decision may be shaped more by administrative necessity than by clinical nuance. When mandates are reduced or removed, vaccination decisions return more fully to the pediatric healthcare setting.
This shifts the discussion to direct conversations between parents and pediatricians, allowing decisions to reflect the child’s medical history, needs, and family priorities. These exchanges often consider a range of factors, including prior health conditions, developmental stage, previous vaccine responses in the child and family members, and the family’s capacity for follow-up and monitoring. They also allow space for guidance, questions, and ongoing reassessment over time, without the additional influence of school enrollment requirements.
Within this care framework, nutritional status becomes one modifiable factor clinicians and families can assess and support. Because nutrition intersects with immune function, metabolic health, and overall development, it can be discussed alongside other aspects of pediatric care without displacing medical oversight.
Foundational health vs. acute protection
Public health strategies operate on different time scales. Acute protections, such as vaccines and antiviral treatments, are designed to reduce the risk or severity of infection at the moment exposure occurs. They function as targeted interventions, intended to interrupt disease transmission or blunt illness once a pathogen is encountered. Because protection from some vaccines can decrease over time—as observed with COVID-19 and pertussis—baseline health remains relevant even among vaccinated individuals.
In contrast, baseline health operates differently. Factors such as metabolic status, nutrient sufficiency, sleep quality, and overall resilience shape how the body responds when illness arises. These conditions influence inflammatory signaling, immune activity, and recovery capacity over time. While foundational health factors do not prevent exposure to infectious agents, they may affect the likelihood of severe outcomes once infection occurs. Understanding this distinction clarifies why dietary and lifestyle factors function as complementary supports alongside acute medical tools rather than substitutes.
Within this broader perspective on acute and foundational influences, questions may arise about how repeated immune stimulation may affect immune function. Critics of vaccination policies raise concerns about whether repeated or poorly timed immune stimulation could alter immune responsiveness over time. In scientific terms, this discussion reflects questions about physiologic tradeoffs rather than immune suppression. Vaccines are designed to train specific immune responses, not weaken the immune system overall.
Current evidence does not support the claim that vaccination broadly lowers immune function, but it does highlight the importance of context. Immune responses are shaped by multiple influences, including metabolic health, stress, sleep, and nutrient sufficiency. Understanding vaccination as one influence within a broader immune landscape helps move the conversation away from absolutes and toward a more comprehensive view of biological response. If baseline health influences how the body responds to infection, nutrition becomes one of the most discussed foundational elements.
Nutritional Considerations and Immune Function
Many of these mechanisms apply broadly, though their implications vary by age and developmental stage. Overall dietary patterns—particularly diets that are nutrient-dense, meaning rich in vitamins, minerals, and other essential compounds relative to their calorie content, and lower in refined carbohydrates and ultra-processed foods—may influence metabolic and immune resilience. Rather than acting through a single pathway, nutrition influences immune function through interconnected systems that regulate inflammation, cellular communication, and energy availability. Several key nutrients play established roles in supporting normal host defense. The examples below highlight several well-studied nutrients involved in immune regulation:
- Vitamin D supports immune signaling and plays a role in regulating both innate and adaptive immune responses. Insufficiency is common in many populations, particularly among individuals with limited sun exposure, darker skin pigmentation, or certain metabolic conditions. Low vitamin D status has been associated with altered immune responses, prompting ongoing research into its role in infection outcomes, including respiratory illnesses such as COVID-19. Adequate vitamin K2 is also important for directing calcium metabolism alongside vitamin D, highlighting the complexity of nutrient interactions within immune and metabolic systems. Dietary sources include fatty fish such as salmon and sardines, egg yolks, and fermented foods like natto and certain cheeses, alongside sunlight exposure.
- Vitamin C functions as an antioxidant and contributes to immune defense by supporting epithelial barriers, leukocyte function, and oxidative stress regulation. During periods of illness or physiological stress, vitamin C demands may increase, reflecting its role in maintaining healthy immune responses rather than acting as a direct antimicrobial agent. Research has explored its supportive role during respiratory infections, including pertussis, though it is not a substitute for medical care. Whole food sources include citrus fruits, berries, kiwi, bell peppers, and leafy greens.
- Vitamin A plays a critical role in maintaining epithelial integrity and supporting mucosal immune defenses. Deficiency has historically been associated with increased severity of infections, particularly measles, and supplementation has been used in certain clinical settings to reduce complications. Its role reinforces the importance of baseline nutrient sufficiency in shaping immune responses. Sources include liver, eggs, dairy products, and provitamin A carotenoid–rich foods such as carrots, sweet potatoes, and dark leafy greens.
- Zinc and selenium are trace minerals involved in antiviral defense and immune regulation. Zinc plays a role in maintaining the integrity of immune cells and intracellular pathways, while selenium contributes to antioxidant systems that help regulate inflammation and cellular damage. Deficiencies in either mineral can impair immune responsiveness, highlighting the importance of adequate intake through diet or, when appropriate, supplementation. Food sources include zinc-rich options such as shellfish, red meat, poultry, pumpkin seeds, and nuts, along with selenium-rich foods including Brazil nuts and seafood such as tuna, salmon, sardines, and shrimp.
- Magnesium supports immune function indirectly through its role in energy metabolism, stress regulation, and inflammatory control. It participates in hundreds of enzymatic reactions, including those involved in cellular energy production and nervous system activity. Suboptimal magnesium status has been associated with increased inflammatory markers and altered stress responses, which may influence immune resilience over time. Dietary sources include leafy greens, legumes, nuts, seeds, and whole grains.
- Omega-3 fatty acids, particularly EPA and DHA, contribute to immune balance by modulating inflammatory pathways rather than suppressing immune activity. These fatty acids are involved in the production of regulatory molecules that help resolve inflammation, a process essential for appropriate immune responses and recovery following infection. Dietary intake of omega-3s varies widely, often depending on access to fatty fish or fortified foods. Primary sources include wild salmon, mackerel, and sardines, as well as walnuts, flaxseeds, and chia seeds.
Nutrition is closely linked with other lifestyle factors. Sleep quality, physical activity, and chronic stress levels are interconnected with nutrient metabolism, inflammatory processes, and physiological regulation. Inadequate sleep can alter host defenses and impair glucose regulation, while regular movement supports metabolic flexibility and circulation of immune cells. Grounding techniques that reduce physiological stress may also influence biological pathways indirectly through nervous system function.
Chronic psychological stress, particularly when unaddressed, can disrupt hormonal balance and increase inflammatory activity, potentially diminishing the benefits of otherwise adequate nutrition. These interrelated behaviors are also associated with lower rates of obesity, insulin resistance, and other chronic conditions linked to worse infectious disease outcomes.
Pediatric immune development in context
These determinants are especially important during childhood, when immune systems are still developing. Immune function evolves dynamically throughout childhood, shaped by a combination of genetics, early-life exposures, nutrition, sleep, and overall health status. During infancy, the immune system is still maturing, relying heavily on innate defenses while gradually building adaptive responses. This early period represents a particularly sensitive window, as immune regulation and tolerance are still being established.
Nutrition plays a distinct role during this phase of development. In the first year of life, when the majority of routine childhood vaccinations are administered, immune support is influenced not only by an infant’s direct intake but also by maternal health and nutrition. Breastfeeding, when present, provides immune-active components such as antibodies, fatty acids, and bioactive compounds that help shape early immune responses. Maternal nutrient status during pregnancy and lactation may also influence immune development during this foundational period.
As children grow, immune development continues to be shaped by diet alongside other factors, including physical activity, stress, and environmental exposures. Encountering common pathogens is also a natural part of immune maturation. For most children, experiencing and recovering from routine infections contributes to immune memory and functional calibration over time. While severe illness warrants appropriate medical care, not every exposure represents failure; in many cases, recovery reflects an immune system performing as designed.
Within this context, nutrition becomes one meaningful element of pediatric health, integrated alongside medical guidance and age-appropriate preventive care. These developmental considerations also highlight how broader food environments shape nutritional exposures across populations.
Dietary guidance and unresolved gaps
Although nutrition influences immune and metabolic health biologically, that impact is not always reflected in how dietary guidance is written or implemented at the population level. Recent updates to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030, the federal nutrition recommendations issued every five years, have effectively introduced a new food pyramid, with a renewed emphasis on whole foods. The revised framework highlights adequate protein across meals, the inclusion of full-fat or minimally processed dairy, and the role of dietary fats in supporting metabolic and immune health. It also prioritizes vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes, nuts, and other real foods, while encouraging reduced intake on ultra-processed products high in added sugars and refined starches. This shift aligns federal nutrition guidance more closely with evidence linking dietary quality to long-term health outcomes.
Because federal nutrition standards shape institutional meals—particularly school breakfast and lunch programs—these recommendations also carry implications for immune resilience across communities. For many children, especially those in food-insecure households, school meals represent a primary source of daily nutrition. Aligning these programs with whole-food patterns—including regular access to vegetables and fruits, adequate protein, and nutrient-dense options—may support immune function during critical periods of growth while also helping address issues of access and affordability. These changes may have ripple effects across other institutional settings shaped by federal nutrition guidance.
While the updated Dietary Guidelines for Americans reflect meaningful shifts toward whole foods and dietary quality, some long-standing fat recommendations continue unchanged. Limiting saturated fat to no more than 10 percent of daily calories remains the subject of ongoing scientific debate. In recent years, several large reviews and meta-analyses have questioned the strength of evidence linking saturated fat in isolation to increased cardiovascular disease risk, suggesting that overall dietary composition, food sources, and metabolic context may be more important than any single macronutrient threshold.
At the same time, the guidelines offer little direction on limiting industrial seed oils, commonly derived from corn, soybean, canola, sunflower, and safflower. These oils now account for a significant share of modern fat intake, largely through ultra-processed foods. Because they are high in omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and prone to oxidation during processing, storage, and high-heat cooking, their quality and stability have become an increasing focus of metabolic research. Emerging evidence has explored associations between excessive omega-6 intake, oxidized fats, chronic inflammation, and disruptions in metabolic and immune signaling. In this context, fat quality may be as important as total fat quantity. The absence of specific guidance on industrial seed oils highlights the difference between emphasizing dietary quality in principle and addressing the fat sources that shape metabolic and immune resilience in practice.
Equity and access considerations
However, guidance alone does not ensure implementation. Recommendations built around fresh, nutrient-dense foods often presume consistent access to affordable groceries, adequate food storage and preparation resources, and the time required to plan and prepare meals—conditions that vary widely across communities.
If vaccine mandates are reduced or removed without parallel investments in nutritional education and food access, existing disparities in health outcomes may widen. Populations already facing higher rates of chronic disease, food insecurity, or limited healthcare access may be more vulnerable to infectious illness, regardless of individual intent or awareness. In this context, personal choice does not always translate to equal opportunity.
Addressing equity does not require uniform solutions, but it does depend on acknowledging that health status is shaped by structural conditions as well as individual behavior. Public health strategies that emphasize nutrition are most effective when paired with efforts to improve access to real food, preventive care, and credible health information across diverse settings. Without attention to access, even well-intentioned health guidance may fall short of its intended effect.
Public Health Approaches Going Forward
Given these intersecting considerations, public health strategies may benefit from a broader focus on strengthening overall health foundations while preserving access to medical interventions. A balanced approach recognizes that population resilience is shaped by multiple inputs operating together over time. A forward-looking strategy may involve:
- Maintaining voluntary access to vaccines while allowing greater autonomy in decision-making, ensuring that individuals and families can engage with vaccination through informed discussions with healthcare providers rather than administrative mandates alone.
- Implementing public programs to improve nutritional literacy and nutrient intake, particularly in settings such as schools, assisted living facilities, and underserved communities, where access to nutrient-dense foods and health education may be limited.
- Monitoring indicators such as vitamin D status and general nutrient sufficiency alongside traditional health measures, allowing clinicians and public health systems to identify modifiable risk factors that may influence immune function and disease outcomes.
- Addressing broader lifestyle factors, including diet quality, metabolic health, sleep, movement, and stress, as part of disease prevention efforts that extend beyond acute care and toward long-term resilience.
- Supporting public education on early recognition and treatment options for infectious illnesses, including vaccine-preventable diseases, so individuals and families understand when to seek care and what evidence-based therapies may be available.
Practical guardrails
As you think about how nutrition, lifestyle, and medical care fit together, a few practical guardrails can help keep expectations realistic and decisions well-informed for both children and adults. Nutrition can support baseline wellness when integrated with appropriate medical guidance, especially for children with underlying conditions or complex health needs. Decisions are best made with an understanding of medical history, developmental stage, and environment.
Supplement use also deserves care. More isn’t always better, and excessive intake of certain nutrients can carry risks. Focusing first on overall dietary quality and daily health habits often provides a stronger foundation than adding supplements early, especially without direction from a qualified healthcare provider familiar with pediatric needs.
Sustainability matters as well. Health practices that are overly restrictive, expensive, or difficult to maintain can create stress without delivering meaningful benefit. Approaches that fit your resources, culture, and day-to-day realities are more likely to support long-term health than rigid or idealized plans. Finally, it helps to view health decisions as something you revisit over time rather than a fixed choice. Children’s needs change as they grow, and what works at one stage may need adjustment later. Staying open to reassessment and maintaining dialogue with healthcare providers allows you to respond thoughtfully as circumstances evolve.
A broader view of prevention
As policies shift, the conditions shaping baseline health become increasingly important. Strengthening nutritional support, improving access to preventive care, and addressing underlying metabolic and lifestyle risk factors may help sustain community resilience, regardless of how vaccination decisions are structured. These measures function upstream, influencing how individuals and populations respond when illness occurs.
Approaching public health through this broader lens supports a more balanced conversation—one that respects individual decision-making while acknowledging the shared environments in which health outcomes unfold. In this context, informed choices are supported not only by access to medical tools, but by the systems and conditions that help people remain resilient over time.
~
Published on February 26, 2026.
If you’ve found value in this article, please share it!
To support the research and health education of AVFC editorial, please consider making a donation today. Thank you.
