EDITOR’S SUMMARY: The rise of industrial chicken farming has profoundly impacted animal welfare, public health, and the environment. Rapid growth and intensive practices have reshaped the American diet—and what that means for the chickens themselves. Common labels and marketing claims are explored alongside the realities of vaccination and factory conditions, providing a clear picture of what goes into the chicken on your plate. More importantly, practical steps are offered to help you make choices that support better standards and push the system toward greater transparency and care.
By Sarah Campise Hallier
Chicken wasn’t always a staple of the American diet. For most of human history, chickens were kept for their eggs, not their meat. They were small, lean, and slow-growing birds—nothing like the oversized broilers you find wrapped in plastic today. Broilers are chickens bred specifically for meat production, selected for their rapid growth and larger size. In many parts of the world, and even here in the United States just a century ago, eating chicken was reserved for special occasions. Everything began to shift in the early 20th century—and it may have been by accident. In 1923, a Delaware farmer named Cecile Steele ordered 50 chicks but unexpectedly received 500. Instead of returning them, she raised the birds for meat. They sold quickly, and the profit was better than eggs. Steele doubled down the next year and inspired a trend that grew into a national industry. Her surprise order is now credited as the birth of commercial broiler farming.
By the 1950s, chicken production in the United States was no longer small-scale or seasonal; it had become industrialized. Government-funded breeding programs were developed to produce chickens that grew faster and bigger, particularly in the breast area, to meet American consumer preferences. Feed formulas were optimized, housing systems were confined, and breeding focused entirely on yield. Today’s commercial chicken, as a result, is a genetically distinct animal. It reaches slaughter weight in just six weeks—more than twice as fast as chickens raised just 70 years ago. Currently, chicken is the most consumed meat in the U.S. The average American eats more than 100 pounds of chicken annually, far outpacing beef and pork. You’ll find it in everything from nuggets to salads to freezer packs. Part of this dominance stems from cultural perception: chicken has long been marketed as a healthy, lean, clean protein. It’s less expensive than beef, simpler to prepare, and lacks the negative associations often linked to red meat. But what you probably don’t hear enough about is how the chicken gets to your plate—and what happens along the way.
Most of the chicken sold in the U.S. doesn’t come from small family farms. It comes from vertically-integrated factory operations that raise tens of thousands of birds at a time in massive, windowless sheds. These birds live shoulder to shoulder in confined spaces, often standing in their own waste, breathing in ammonia-filled air, and suffering from extreme physical strain due to rapid, unnatural growth. They’re bred to develop more breast meat than their skeletal systems can support. Many can barely stand by the time they reach slaughter weight. On top of that, beak trimming, also known as debeaking, is a common practice in the poultry industry. This procedure involves removing portions of the beak to prevent behaviors such as feather pecking and cannibalism—problems that can arise when birds are housed in close quarters. The beak is a sensitive organ rich in nerve endings, and trimming it can cause both acute and chronic pain by irritating these nerves, leading to persistent discomfort.
These aren’t isolated issues. According to The Humane League, over 99% of broiler chickens in the U.S. are raised under these industrial conditions. “We’ve got to be careful about what we’re breeding,” claims Dr. Temple Grandin, professor of animal science at Colorado State University and the world’s leading expert on designing livestock handling facilities and animal welfare practices. She adds that “today’s larger livestock are outgrowing animal handling equipment.” The breeding programs that made chicken cheap and abundant have also made the animals biologically fragile—and often miserable.
How Chickens Are Engineered for Speed
While added hormones and steroids have been banned in U.S. poultry production since the 1950s, that doesn’t mean chickens are raised naturally. Instead, the industry relies on a combination of selective breeding, antibiotics, and feed additives to achieve rapid development. Broiler chickens’ extreme size increase is thanks to genetic selection and engineered diets, not hormones. Feed additives like acidifiers and probiotics further boost growth and feed efficiency. So while “no added hormones” sounds reassuring, it’s only a small part of a much bigger, highly-manipulated system. For decades, low doses of antibiotics have been routinely included in poultry feed, not to treat illness, but to prevent it and to promote weight gain. These birds are raised in cramped, often unsanitary conditions where disease spreads fast. Antibiotics help offset that risk while speeding up production timelines.
But the unintended consequence has been alarming. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has repeatedly warned that antibiotic overuse in livestock is contributing to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria—so-called “superbugs” that no longer respond to commonly used drugs. Former CDC Director Dr. Tom Frieden was quoted, “antibiotic resistance threatens to turn back the clock to a pre-antibiotic era.” The World Health Organization has made similar warnings, pointing to livestock antibiotics as a key factor in growing global resistance. In recent years, consumer pressure has led to changes in how antibiotics are used in both poultry and egg production. Packages labeled “antibiotic-free” or “no antibiotics ever” may sound reassuring, but the truth is often murkier. Some producers still administer antibiotics at the hatchery stage, before the label technically applies. Unless eggs or poultry are certified by USDA Organic, Animal Welfare Approved, or Certified Humane, there’s no guarantee that these claims reflect the full production process.
If you’re trying to avoid unnecessary additives, it’s worth knowing how your food is handled before it reaches the store. In the United States, chlorine-based antimicrobial treatments continue to be used in poultry processing. These treatments involve immersing chicken carcasses in chlorinated water or applying chlorine-based sprays to reduce bacterial contamination from pathogens such as Salmonella and Campylobacter. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) permits chlorine concentrations up to 50 parts per million (ppm) in chiller baths—cold water immersion used to lower microbial presence. Although these levels are considered safe by U.S. regulatory agencies, the European Union banned the import of chlorinated chicken in 1997, citing concerns that such chemical treatments might mask substandard hygiene practices earlier in the production chain.
In response to consumer preferences and export considerations, the U.S. has attempted to adopt alternatives to chlorine, such as peracetic acid (a combination of vinegar and hydrogen peroxide). If you prefer to avoid chemically treated poultry, options like “air-chilled” chicken or products labeled “organic” may offer alternatives. These methods typically do not involve chlorine baths. However, it is important to note that labeling requirements for antimicrobial treatments are limited, making it challenging to determine the specific processing methods used for a given product.
Of course, how chickens are raised and what they’re treated with matters—but it’s not just about the chicken on your plate. It’s also about what the chicken was fed. Most conventional chickens are raised on a steady diet of GMO corn, GMO soy, wheat, and barley. These genetically-modified crops are typically grown with heavy pesticide use, raising concerns about their impact on human health. Organic feed, on the other hand, excludes GMOs entirely. According to the USDA, over 90% of soy and corn grown in the U.S. is genetically engineered, and many other crops are heavily treated with glyphosate-based herbicides. Even more troubling is that in industrial feed, oils from these same crops are often added back in, intensifying the omega-6 fatty acid content. When consumed in excess, this has been linked to chronic inflammation and a “heightened and potentially harmful state of immune system activation.”
Even in pasture-based systems, what chickens eat makes a difference. Yes, they have access to forage, but nearly all are supplemented with some form of grain-based feed to support faster growth and egg production. The quality of that supplemental feed is crucial. If the grains are corn and soy-based, even if organic, the omega-6 levels in the meat can remain high. Studies published confirm that pasture access alone does not guarantee optimal fat profiles unless paired with a clean, supplemental diet. The study titled “Influence of Pasture Intake on the Fatty Acid Composition, and Cholesterol, Tocopherols, and Tocotrienols Content in Meat from Free-Range Broilers” states:
“Over the last centuries, Western diets acquired a dramatic imbalance in the ratio of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) to saturated fatty acids (SFA) with a concomitant reduction in the dietary proportion of n-3 PUFA. Pastures are a good source of n-3 fatty acids, although the effect of forage intake in the fatty acid profile of meat from free-range chicken remains to be evaluated.”
You think about how chickens are raised—but what happens to their eggs after they’re laid is just as important. Eggs are typically washed with chemical sanitizers, including bleach, and sometimes coated in mineral oil to extend shelf life. While these steps are meant to reduce contamination, they can leave behind residues. In some regions, eggs have even been found to contain PFAS—“forever chemicals”—raising additional concerns about long-term exposure.
Beyond nutritional and labeling concerns, there are larger ethical questions to consider. Chickens are sentient animals capable of social interaction, learning, and even empathy. Yet most broilers raised in the U.S. never see daylight or feel grass under their feet. Their lives are short, stressful, and devoid of natural behaviors. They are bred for profit, not welfare, and they pay for it physically—often with painful conditions like lameness, heart failure, and deformities. Consumers rarely see that side of the story. It’s tucked away behind clean packaging and clever slogans. Meanwhile, the U.S. poultry industry’s reach extends far beyond domestic borders. From 2001 to 2021, poultry imports and exports increased most in sub-Saharan Africa, expanding from 0.33 million metric tons to 1.96 million metric tons. Latin American and Caribbean countries accounted for the second-largest increase, with imports growing by 1.13 million metric tons. While these imports and exports provide affordable protein to many, they can also disrupt local economies. In countries like Ghana and South Africa, the influx of cheap, imported chicken has undercut local farmers, making it difficult for them to compete and sustain their livelihoods. This dynamic places added pressure on food sovereignty and the long-term sustainability of local agriculture.
Amid concerns about antibiotics and overcrowding, vaccination is another common intervention in modern poultry systems—one that’s often overlooked in conversations about chicken production. Vaccination is a standard practice in large-scale poultry farms to protect chicks from common diseases and ensure flock health. In California, for example, vaccination is required by law for all farms housing more than 3,000 chickens. This measure helps reduce outbreaks of infectious diseases that could devastate flocks and disrupt the poultry supply chain.
Even small local farms often vaccinate their birds, especially if they purchase chicks rather than raising them onsite. Because most commercial operations vaccinate chicks before shipping, many small-scale farms end up with vaccinated birds, whether intentionally or not. This widespread vaccination practice plays a key role in maintaining flock health but also reflects the industrial nature of modern poultry production. The review, “Effects of induced stress from the live LaSota Newcastle disease vaccination on the growth performance and immune function in broiler chickens,” highlights the physiological stress, hormonal shifts, and potential immune system damage linked to over-vaccination—showing that more isn’t always better when it comes to chick health:
“… vaccination-induced stress increased serum adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol, affected growth performance (average daily gain, average daily feed intake, and feed conversion ratio), and triggered apoptosis [programmed cell death] in spleen lymphocytes … This study suggests that NDV [Newcastle Disease Virus] vaccine doses in broilers must be controlled judiciously because increasing the number of doses resulted in increased lymphocyte apoptosis while the peak of the antibody titer and optimal growth performance were achieved at a low number of doses (2 doses).”
Behind the scenes of industrial poultry production are the workers who process millions of chickens daily. These jobs are often physically demanding, with high rates of injury due to repetitive motions and the fast pace of processing lines. According to Oxfam America, poultry workers earn low wages and endure harsh, often dehumanizing conditions. While much attention is given to physical injuries, there are also psychological impacts. The repetitive nature of the work, combined with exposure to animal suffering, can lead to mental health issues such as depression and anxiety. A study published in PubMed, “The Psychological Impact of Slaughterhouse Employment: A Systematic Literature Review,” found that employees at meat processing plants have a significantly higher prevalence of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms compared to the general population. These challenges highlight the need for better labor protections, slower processing speeds, and mental health support for workers in the poultry industry.
Moving Toward Solutions
It’s easy to feel stuck when balancing the demands of eating “healthy” on a budget or putting quick meals on the table for your family. The complexities of the industrial poultry system can make ethical choices seem overwhelming or out of reach. But the truth is, even small, thoughtful steps can have a meaningful impact—helping to reduce harm not only to the animals but also to the health of communities and the environment. Here are six practical ways to make more informed, compassionate choices that align with your values and support a better food system:
- Reduce overall consumption: You don’t have to cut out chicken entirely to make a difference. Even eating it a few times less per week reduces demand and decreases your footprint. This can also help you explore more varied, nutrient-rich meals.
- Seek out credible certification: Look for labels that truly mean something—Certified Humane, Animal Welfare Approved, or USDA Organic. Even better, buy from local farms where you can ask questions and see conditions for yourself.
Not all labels mean the same thing when it comes to how chickens are raised or how they’re altered to manage behavior. If you’re choosing meat or eggs based on welfare claims, it’s important to understand what each certification actually allows so that you can make more confident decisions. Here’s a breakdown of what each certification means for how chickens are raised and how their meat or eggs are produced:
USDA Organic: Chickens must be produced without antibiotics and fed a diet free of GMOs, synthetic pesticides, and chemical fertilizers. They must have access to the outdoors, though the amount and quality of that outdoor space can differ significantly. The “organic” label reflects USDA minimum standards but doesn’t guarantee pasture access or optimal foraging conditions. Organic chickens may still be raised in large-scale operations, as long as they meet minimum space and access rules.
Certified Humane: This label focuses on animal welfare and handling practices, rather than environmental or chemical concerns. It requires specific space allowances, environmental enrichment (such as perches), and prohibits cages. Outdoor access is not required. Feed may include genetically-modified ingredients.
Animal Welfare Approved (AWA): Widely considered the most rigorous livestock care certification, AWA requires continuous outdoor pasture access, prohibits cages and confinement, and does not allow GMO feed. It also prohibits routine use of antibiotics and mandates higher space and foraging standards than both USDA Organic and Certified Humane. The program is run by A Greener World—a nonprofit organization—and applies only to farms that meet the highest standards of humane treatment.
- Purchase directly from farms: Many small-scale farms now offer nationwide or regional delivery, allowing you to order chicken raised with higher welfare standards straight from the source. Buying this way supports farmers who prioritize animal health, transparency, and regenerative practices—even if you don’t live nearby.
- Avoid misleading marketing: Be skeptical of claims like “natural,” “farm-raised,” or “no hormones,” as these often reflect what consumers want to believe rather than what’s actually happening in production.
- Support legislative change: Contact your representatives and urge them to back stronger animal welfare laws, bans on subtherapeutic antibiotic use (low-dose antibiotics that promote growth, prevent illness in crowded conditions, and improve feed efficiency), and greater transparency in food labeling.
- Educate and advocate: Share what you’ve learned—whether in your classroom, workplace, or at the dinner table. Raising awareness is a powerful tool. The more people know, the harder it becomes to ignore.
To navigate all of this, it helps to decode the common marketing terms you see on packages:
- Free-Range: This implies outdoor access, but USDA regulations don’t specify how long or how often birds must be outside.
- Cage-Free: Refers mainly to egg-laying hens, not broilers, and simply means no cages—not necessarily more space or access to the outdoors.
- Pasture-Raised: Indicates birds spend time foraging outdoors on pasture, often with better space and rotation standards—but this term isn’t regulated by the USDA, so third-party certifications matter.
- No Antibiotics Ever: Suggests no antibiotic use during the bird’s life, but only certain certifications verify this claim.
The environmental side of this is complex. Pasture-raised chickens often live in better conditions and contribute to healthier soils through natural fertilizer distribution—the process where chickens fertilize the land as they roam, without extra steps, heavy machinery, or giant waste pits. However, this system requires more land, and pasture-raised chickens grow more slowly, which leads to higher resource use per bird. The industrial chicken system wasn’t inevitable. It was built over decades through a mix of government policy, corporate strategy, and consumer habits. And while it may seem entrenched, it isn’t unchangeable. The future of food doesn’t have to mirror the past, but it does require a shift in what you’re willing to accept, fund, and normalize. A better model prioritizes accountability, reduces harm, and recognizes the cost of convenience—for animals, for workers, and for public health. You don’t have to completely transform your life to make a difference. Every thoughtful choice—whether at the grocery store, in conversation, or at the ballot box—carries weight. These decisions may seem small, but they help steer the system toward one that’s less extractive, more transparent, and worth defending.
~
Published on June 12, 2025.
If you’ve found value in this article, please cross-post and restack it!
To support the research and health education of AVFC editorial, please consider making a donation today. Thank you.